* Monday, 2011-09-26 at 19:33 -0700 - John E Clifford <kali9putra@yahoo.com>: > While I think that it is possible to make both the Platonic (all > types, no individuals) and Buddhist (all segments, no perduring > individuals) models work, they both seem to me needlessly complex as > models for Lojban (or English) semantics. Both languages assume > perduring individuals and admit (if at all) types as syntheses of > individuals and and segments as analyses. Could you explain what you mean by 'segment' here? Martin
Attachment:
pgpS9Q0mRYBuU.pgp
Description: PGP signature