[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: plural
- To: Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@access.digex.net>
- Subject: Re: plural
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1994 12:08:36 -0500
- In-reply-to: <199412151644.LAA21421@cs.columbia.edu> (message from Logical Language Group on Thu, 15 Dec 1994 11:42:45 -0500)
- Reply-to: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
>Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1994 11:42:45 -0500
>From: Logical Language Group <lojbab%ACCESS.DIGEX.NET@CUVMB.CC.COLUMBIA.EDU>
>X-To: lojban@cuvmb.cc.columbia.edu
>Well, you are right, but you are drawing the wrong conclusions. Specifically,
>Veijo's remark that "{go'i} doesn't replicate the {na}" is incorrect.
>A bare "go'i" without any NA ("na" or "ja'a") replicates any "na" in the
>referent, but if an explicit NA is present before the "go'i", it overrides
>any NA in the referent. Thus:
Got it. OK, that makes sense.
>--
>John Cowan sharing account <lojbab@access.digex.net> for now
> e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
~mark