Re: Board decision needed on Loglan/Lojban reciprocity

[Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>]

I'll get Nora's opinion, and maybe Tommy's opinion this weekend.

My main "objection" to reciprocation is that we have no other links to other
conlangs in the first place, whereass it sounds like Jennings is being
inclusionary in including us.  Being our only external link, it would put
focus on TLI Loglan, whereass if we had a page linking to several other
conlangs it would stand out less.

But I am not sure I understand the psychology of Web-climbers weel enough to
know what they would feel about this.  Is it the norm that home pages have
a bunch of links to othersites, or are the links to other sites normally
handled more at an index level?

lojbab