Re: Numbers

[Chris Bogart <cbogart@CSN.ORG>]

>la xorxes. cusku di'e
>>    With the interpretation of the paper, 20ji'i30 would be a number
>>    between 2010 and 2099, or something like that.
>
>More precisely (but not necessarily more accurately), it expresses a random
>variable whose range is 2000-2099 and whose measure of central tendency
>(exactly which measure is unspecified) is 2030.

It would not be a symmetrical function then, with a range and central
tendency like that.  Jorge's method allows arbitrary specification of either
the range (20ji'i30 = 20 to 30) or the central tendency (ji'i20 = about 20),
but not both. Yours allows for both (2ji'i5 = 20 to 29, about 25) but the
range must coincide with exact powers of ten.

pe'i for normal inexact human speech John's method is exact enough and more
powerful than Jorge's, but it's also less intuitive.  It could be, though,
that that's malrarna intuition that could/should be unleared if there's a
better way.

                     ____
 Chris Bogart        \  /  ftp://ftp.csn.org/cbogart/html/homepage.html
 Quetzal Consulting   \/   cbogart@quetzal.com