[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: More about scopes
- To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
- Subject: Re: More about scopes
- From: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 1995 12:35:38 -0400
- In-reply-to: <199504091944.PAA29442@locke.ccil.org> from "ucleaar" at Apr 9, 95 03:53:26 pm
- Reply-to: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
la xorxes. cusku di'e
> > Then I don't see the point of {ro} being the default. {piro} seems much
> > better.
la .and. cusku di'e
> I agree. {piro} makes more sense.
I suppose I should have said that when referring to individuals, "ro" is
the default, and when referring to masses, "pisu'o" is the default. (Whether
it should be "pisu'o" or "piro" hangs on the question of how the mass
fractionator issue is resolved, which should be C-4 on Jorge's list.)
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
e'osai ko sarji la lojban.