[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ci cribe
- To: Nefud the Delirious <nefud@IO.COM>
- Subject: Re: ci cribe
- From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
- Date: Sun May 14 14:06:35 1995
- In-reply-to: (Your message of Tue, 09 May 95 13:53:59 EDT.)
Jorge:
> And:
> > > To get the second meaning, I would say:
> > > le ci cribe cu batci rori
> > This doesn't make much sense to me. It seems to me to mean
> > "Each of the three bears bit each of itself" - daft.
> Well, I tried to give it some meaning. I don't know what is
> the meaning of quantifying a variable that is already quantified.
> What do these mean:
> ro da voi cribe zo'u da batci ro da
> ro da voi cribe zo'u da batci su'o da
> ro da voi cribe zo'u da batci re da
> I would say they mean, respectively:
> Each bear bit each bear.
> Each bear bit at least one of the bears.
> Each bear bit two of the bears.
I think this is a good rule of interpretation (given that Lojban
is too advanced in its design for any kind of significant revision).
I don't think it falls out from the present rule system (& this is
what I meant when I said it makes no sense), but I would support
adding such a rule.
----
shaw haw me hay And