[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
tolmutce
>> <- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - >
>> traji na mutce na milxe na | milxe mutce traji
>> to'e no'e je'a
>> | na'e |
>
>Why not enrich the scale:
>
>traji (na) extremely not something
>mutce (na) very much not something
>milxe (na) somewhat not something
>tolmutce (na) very little not something
>nutli neutral
>tolmutce very little
>milxe somewhat
>mutce very much
>traji extremely
>
>
>> Given that each of these words have particular places on the scale,
>> treating each term as its own scale is at best ambiguous.
>
>I don't see the problem. What else could {tolmutce} be but "very
>little of"?
Except by context, I would have had no idea in the example where you
first raised it. Looking at my diagram, where mutce is somewhere in the
non-extreme of one side, I think I would have presumed it to be where
"mutce na" is on the diagram. ("nalmutce", of course could mean either
"traji" "no'e" or "na")
lojbab