Re: mass again

[jorge@phyast.pitt.edu]

> >> lo junta be loi remna cu ki'ogra li xa .a li vonono,ki'o,ki'o .a li tu'o
> >> A weight of the mass of humanity is in kilograms "6" or "400,000,000" or
> >>                                         "almost any number you choose".
> >
> >You are claiming that at least one of those is true, which is a weaker
> >claim than what you mean, I think.
> >
> >I think that what you meant to say is:
> >
> >li xa e li vononoki'oki'o e li tu'o cu se ki'ogra lo junta be loi remna
>
> Not what I meant to say.  I obviously wanted the mutual XOR, which for 3
> items is impractical to do with logical connectives.

But XOR would say that only one is true. Don't you mean that:

6 is the number of kilograms of some mass of humans
                        AND
400,000,000 is the number of kilograms of some mass of humans
                        AND
"whatever" is the number of kilograms of some mass of humans


Of course, which mass of humans is different for each number, that's why
{loi remna} has to come after the {e}s. The XOR version would say that
only one of those is true, but you want to say that all of them are.


> So my more correct statement should have been:
> lo junta be loi remna cu ki'ogra pa lu'a li xa ce li vonono,ki'o,ki'o ce li
 tu'o

That says the same as the XOR version, but it is a weaker claim than what
you want. You are saying that only one of those three weights is the weight
of some mass of humans. But you want to say that all of those weights are
the weights of some mass (a different mass for each).


Jorge