Cowan wrote: >It has never been settled, I don't think, whether ri/ra/ru are de dicto >or de re: in other words, does "lo nanmu batci ri" mean "lo nanmu batci >vo'a" (de re) or "lo nanmu batci lo nanmu" (de dicto). I lean toward >the first interpretation, which is consonant with history. Cowan and I agreed by phone that "de re" ri=vo'a in the above is correct. lojbab