[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Names
- To: Veijo Vilva <veion@XIRON.PC.HELSINKI.FI>
- Subject: Re: Names
- From: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 22:35:05 +0100
- In-reply-to: (Your message of Thu, 31 Aug 95 14:45:19 EDT.) <199508311932.UAA28009@listserv.rl.ac.uk>
- Reply-to: ucleaar <ucleaar@UCL.AC.UK>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
> I just realized that there is a much better way of creating
> a predicate out of a name than using {me} or {du}.
> {me} is not so good because it means "pertains to",
> {du} doesn't really create a predicate, it just identifies
> two sumti, which is a different thing.
> But there is a way to make a real predicate out of a name,
> using {zei}:
> mi cu zei xorxes
I hope this works - I agree {me} & {du} are no good. Can one
say {lo cu zei xorxes} or {lo zei xorxes}? If so, then neat
idea!
---
And