[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: future tense
- To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Subject: Re: future tense
- From: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
- Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 12:23:26 +0300
- In-reply-to: <199510040009.DAA10003@feast.fe.msk.ru>; from "Steven M. Belknap" at Tue, 3 Oct 1995 19:14:00 +0100
- Organization: Institute for Commercial Engineering
- Reply-to: Cyril Slobin <slobin@FEAST.FE.MSK.RU>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
coi
> possible that there really is no place such as Russia, (I've never been
> there...) and its all a grand, apparently pointless conspiracy to convince
> me there is a Russia.
Or United States... :-)
> Didn't Loglan distinguish between the prophetic sense of a future
> occurence, and the predictive sense? I seem to remember that from the
> latest edition of the Loglan textbook.
There is a bunch of "evidentials" to express state of your knowlege - like "I
hear", "I observe", "I opine" etc...
co'o mi'e kir.
--
Cyril Slobin <slobin@fe.msk.ru> `When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said,
<http://www.fe.msk.ru/~slobin/> `it means just what I choose it to mean'