correction to cowan on rafsi

[Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>]

>#Specifically, for gismu of the form "C1V2C3C4V5" like "sakli", the possible
>#CVC-form rafsi are 123 ("sak") and 124 ("sal"); the only possible CVV-form
>#rafsi is 125, with or without an apostrophe between the vowels ("sa'i" or
>#"sai"); and the possible CCV rafsi are 345 ("kli") and 125 ("sli").
>
>You mean 145 for the last one.
>
>The term for lujvo made up solely of three-letter rafsi is "fully reduced
>lujvo".  Here are some examples of fully reduced lujvo:

Neither is correct

For a CVCCV, the possible rafsi are
123
124
125
345
and rarely 132 (kerfa -> kre)

For a CCVCV
134
234
135
235
123

lojbab