>this is the lojbanic answer since the X2 of sovda refers to the species of the
> parent.
>
>This almost looks like language structure forcing an interpretation.
Yes, I guess you're right. But its still an interesting problem for
translating into lojban.
I would suggest: try a more literal translation of the English argument
you've got, at least as a first cut. Also, use {dzena} for ancestor.
chris