[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Observatives (simple)
- To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Subject: Observatives (simple)
- From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu Dec 7 11:23:55 1995
- In-reply-to: <199512070105.UAA12429@minerva.phyast.pitt.edu> (message from Jorge Llambias on Wed, 6 Dec 1995 20:05:54 -0500)
- Reply-to: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@GNU.AI.MIT.EDU>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
> What is the semantic difference between {ta blanu} and {blanu fa ta}?
{ta blanu} and {blanu fa ta} are both examples of bridi with a filled
first place. Both utterances mean "This at which I point is blue."
The difference in meaning, if any, is in emphasis.
ta blanu *This* is blue.
blanu fa ta This is *blue*.
Incidentally, Jorge said regarding this query:
I don't see any special semantic content in the "observative" form.
I don't know what he meant here. Neither of those examples are
observatives.
An observative lacks a first place:
blanu A blue thing.
Look: something blue.
See section 2 in John Cowan's Places paper for an example with {klama}:
klama la bastn. la .atlantas. le dargu le karce
A-goer to-Boston from-Atlanta via-the road using-the car.
Goes to-Boston from-Atlanta via-the road using-the car.
Look: a goer to Boston from Atlanta via the road using the car!