[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *old response on "moskvas"
- To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Subject: Re: *old response on "moskvas"
- From: Ivan A Derzhanski <IAD@BGEARN.BITNET>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 1996 10:25:53 +0200
- In-reply-to: Message of Sun, 11 Feb 1996 01:52:50 -0500 from <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET>
- Reply-to: Ivan A Derzhanski <IAD@BGEARN.BITNET>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
On Sun, 11 Feb 1996 01:52:50 -0500 Logical Language Group said:
[re Moscow's Russian name and its possible lojbanisation]
>Thus the choice is presumably between "mazg,VAS." or "mask,FAS." and the
>former seems more true to the Russian pronunciation scheme than the latter.
Actually, neither is close. That /v/ acts as a sonorant; it doesn't
envoice (is that a word?) preceding consonants. Of course, it doesn't
get devoiced either; assimilation doesn't work in that direction.
The closest thing Lojban has to a sonorant /v/ is, I reckon, non-syllabic
/u/, so {mosKUA} (or {mysKUA} if you need to reflect the vowel reduction)
would be my entry. (Though it doesn't beat {zoi rus. Moskva rus.". :-))
--Ivan