[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Caretaker Phrases: Peek-a-Boo
- To: Multiple recipients of list LOJBAN <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: Caretaker Phrases: Peek-a-Boo
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 10:57:44 -0400
- In-reply-to: <199705201553.LAA11569@cs.columbia.edu> (message from Mark Vines on Tue, 20 May 1997 10:54:36 -0600)
- Reply-to: "Mark E. Shoulson" <shoulson@CS.COLUMBIA.EDU>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
>Date: Tue, 20 May 1997 10:54:36 -0600
>From: Mark Vines <vinesm@wholefoods.com>
>
> grandfather = le mampa'u / le pafpa'u
> nanny / babysitter = le verku'i
> wet-nurse = le cifku'i
> family friend = le lanzu pendo
> housekeeper = le zdaku'i
>
>le jvoste defines {verku'i} as wet-nurse, but I feel
>rather strongly that this term is better suited for a
>nanny or babysitter. For wet-nurse, I would suggest
>{ladydu'a cifku'i}. If a shorter word is desirable,
>I'd suggest {cifku'i} for wet-nurse, & {verku'i} for
>nanny or babysitter.
I'd think that over 90% of the time, unless more than one of the above is
present or in recent consideration/conversation, "le kurji" would suffice.
What does it really gain to be more specific if "le kurji" uniquely
identifies the person (from those whom you are likely to be talking about)?
~mark