[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comparison: Loglan / Lojban ?
- To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Subject: Re: Comparison: Loglan / Lojban ?
- From: Mark Vines <vinesm@wholefoods.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 10:47:43 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: Logical Language Group <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET> "Comparison: Loglan / Lojban ?" (Aug 25, 4:14pm)
- Reply-to: mark.vines@wholefoods.com
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
coi doi lobypli
Bob LeChevalier <lojbab@ACCESS.DIGEX.NET> said:
> Another area of significant difference is that we worked
> with an existing semantic problem involving varying levels
> of abstraction (the phrase "object raising" is used in
> linguistics, and we use "sumti raising" in the more
> generalized Lojban case) within the semantics of many
> predicates. An example of this is the distinction between
> "The food is done" vs. "The preparation of the food is done".
> Lojban requires that the former be marked because "the food"
> is "raised" from the abstraction "the preparation of the
> food". TLI Loglan has no way to mark this. The result is
> semantically very muddy.
Mark Vines responds:
How should sumti raising be marked in Lojban? I doubt that
I am doing this correctly.
co'omi'e markl.