[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RV: na'e entails na?
- To: cowan@ccil.org
- Subject: Re: RV: na'e entails na?
- From: Logical Language Group <lojbab@access.digex.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 01:58:14 -0500 (EST) id BAA05184 for cowan@ccil.org; Wed, 24 Sep 1997 01:43:39 -0400 (EDT)
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 01:43:39 -0400 (EDT)
>JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS wrote:
>
>> Could you give a sentence with your definition of na'e as
>> a selbri modifier that says something useful?
>
>No. I retract my arguments, and move to the Jorge/lojbab
>camp.
I ahven't been keeping up. I thought Jorge disagreed with me, or was that
only about to'e and not about na'e?
lojbab