[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: terminators and bilingualism
- To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Subject: Re: terminators and bilingualism
- From: And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 12:25:25 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: University of Central Lancashire
- Reply-to: And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
> As for postpositional languages, I'm not sure
> whether a postposition counts as a terminator or not. It certainly would
> if it marked, say, the end of a relative clause, but I'm not so sure about
> simple case markers. A language which used pre- and post-positions at the
> same time would certainly qualify, though.
A circumposition would count, I think. What I have in mind is
where you have the first half of the circumposition, followed
by a ***phrase*** (not just a single word), followed by the
second half of the circumposition. Do such things exist?
> The problem is that as far as I
> can see, whenever a language has a grammatical word before and after a
> phrase, one of the pair is nearly always elidable.
What are examples of this?
--And