[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more'
- To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Subject: Re: `at least one ' vrs `one or more'
- From: And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 14:07:42 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: University of Central Lancashire
- Reply-to: And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
[my system crashed before I sent my previous answer to this;
I don't know if it got sent to the list. Same goes for another
reply I'll rewrite shortly.]
Bob (to me):
> Can I suggest that discussions about scope of negation,
> etc., use some sort of logical notation instead of
> ordinary English?
>
> This is fine, but does not help answer the question, which English
> translation of
>
> mi na nelci lo mlatu
>
> is better?
>
> I don't like any cats.
> or
> I don't like some cats.
>
> ??
The former is better.
I think you should draw a sharper distinction between the
following two questions:
1. What does a given Lojban expression mean?
2. What is the best way to translate a given Lojban expression
into English.
It is my impression that you mix these two up very confusingly.
I may be mistaken, but that's how you're appearing to me.
--And