[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dacti
- To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Subject: Re: dacti
- From: "Lee Daniel Crocker (none)" <lcrocker@MERCURY.COLOSSUS.NET>
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 1997 17:31:25 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <199711301409.GAA05452@red.colossus.net> from "JORGE JOAQUIN LLAMBIAS" at Nov 28, 97 10:34:16 pm
- Organization: Piclab (http://www.piclab.com/)
- Reply-to: Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
> >If you interpret the words "object enduring in space time" to include
> >abstarctions, we need a better wording of the definition.
>
> Well, yes, if dacti is supposed to be more restricted than that, then
> a clearer definition might be in order.
My copy of the gi'uste says "material object", which seems pretty
clear to me that actual matter is required.