[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Are tanru really metaphors?
- To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Subject: Re: Are tanru really metaphors?
- From: bob@MEGALITH.RATTLESNAKE.COM
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 14:49:40 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <l03102804b0ada10a7ab5@153.37.255.254> (message from Ronald Hale-Evans on Fri, 5 Dec 1997 04:16:16 -0800)
- Reply-to: bob@rattlesnake.com
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
... how to express kennings in Lojban, such as "flame of battle" for
"sword"...
One solution is mentioned in chapter 13 of the refgram:
Alone among the cmavo of selma'o UI, {pe'a} has a rafsi, namely
{pev}. This rafsi is used in forming figurative (culturally
dependent) lujvo, whose place structure need have nothing to do
with the place structure of the components.
Perhaps: pevjamnafagri figurative-war-type-of-fire/flame
or pevdambafagri figurative-fighter-type-of-fire/flame
* fire,
x1 is a fire/flame in fuel x2 burning-in/reacting-with
oxidizer x3 (default air/oxygen)
/:/
/=/ fagri (fag)
* fight,
x1 fight-s/combats/struggles with x2 over issue x3 (abstract);
x1 is a fighter/combatant
/:/ [use x3 tu'a for fight over an object/objective]
/=/ damba (dab da'a)
* war,
x1 (person/mass) wars against x2 over territory/matter x3;
x1 is at war with x2
/:/
/=/ jamna (jam)
Another solution would be prefix all your utterances with {pe'a}, thus
telling listeners to interpret what follows figuratively.
pe'a PEhA start figurative
start figurative (non-literal) speech/text
po'a POhA end figurative
end figurative (non-literal) speech/text
--
Robert J. Chassell bob@rattlesnake.com
P. O. Box 693 bob@ai.mit.edu
Stockbridge, MA 01262-0693 USA (413) 298-4725