[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: truthvalues (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism)
- To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Subject: Re: truthvalues (was Re: ni, jei, perfectionism)
- From: bob@MEGALITH.RATTLESNAKE.COM
- Date: Sat, 6 Dec 1997 09:20:56 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <39E66745CC@mail-gw.uclan.ac.uk> (message from And Rosta on Fri, 5 Dec 1997 18:04:54 GMT+0)
- Reply-to: bob@rattlesnake.com
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
> The truth value of a preoposition is a number, yes. But it ...
> does not have the properties of the common mathematical number
> sets ... It is not transitive, ...
Being a bit nitpicky:
The truth value isn't a number. If it was, then you could do all
that mathsy stuff with it.
Yet more nitpickyness: the mathematician who taught me analysis
considered a value on a scale to be a number. A matter of definition.
A number on scale is one kind of number; there are other kinds, too,
like integers or reals.
And there are different kinds of scale -- we discussed this last
year. Look up `certainty factor' for an example of another type
number on a scale that behaves differently than a truth value.