[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: on du'u (delayed rtesponse)
- To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Subject: Re: on du'u (delayed rtesponse)
- From: And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 13:37:51 -0500 (EST)
- Organization: University of Central Lancashire
- Reply-to: And Rosta <a.rosta@UCLAN.AC.UK>
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
Lojbab:
[snip]
> Does this help either to define nu or to separate nu from du'u?
It accords with my original understanding of these words. However,
according to my original understanding of nu I could not (and
cannot) understand they way it is used to refer to hypothetical
events that may not actually ever occur. Perhaps you could
think about, say, {lo nu} as x2 of troci or nitcu, and see if
you could explain that to me.
--And