[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Summary so far on DJUNO
- To: John Cowan <cowan@LOCKE.CCIL.ORG>
- Subject: Re: Summary so far on DJUNO
- From: bob@rattlesnake.com
- Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 16:35:57 -0500 (EST)
- In-reply-to: <01bd288d$f28d7ae0$82770ed1@roble.intermedia.com.ar> (jorge@intermedia.com.ar)
- Reply-to: bob@rattlesnake.com
- Sender: Lojban list <LOJBAN@CUVMB.BITNET>
> what kind of double check do you want? i thought Yahoo press
> releases were considered defacto truth....
Let's see. How would we say that in Lojban? Here's a possibility:
i do djica le mo remei bo cipra
You want what kind of double-testing?
i mi krici le du'u jinvi le du'u le nuzba be fi la ia'us cu fatci
I believed that it is opined that news from Yahoo are facts.
Any other suggestions? Is that an acceptable use of {fatci}?
Nice. Yes, I think that is an acceptable use of {fatci}. You could also
use {jetnu}.
The former, {fatci}, would be used by someone who figures that there
is a truth and he knows it (and gets jumped on by some people on this
list :). The latter, {jetnu}, might well be used by someone who
figures that you, the listener or reader, know what
standard/epistemology/metaphysics x2 the speaker is using, and if not,
the speaker would be willing to fill in the x2 place.
I'm not sure how this helps us with {djuno}. Would the x4 be filled
with "the set of Yahoo press releases", or with "my (or someone's)
having read a Yahoo press release". The first one could perhaps
be a metaphysics (stretching it a bit) and the second one would
be an epistemology (again, stretching it).
The latter -- x1 knows x2 about x3 by {having read a Yahoo press release}.
I don't think that is stretching anything at all, but is exactly as
djuno should be used.
--
Robert J. Chassell bob@rattlesnake.com
moved house; new address:
952 East St., Lenox, MA 01240 USA +1 (413) 442-7761