[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] final clubs
From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>
la xod cusku di'e
>A imposes no conditions. If A were the only final club, it would have
>to impose the condition of not joining any other final clubs that should
>arise later.
>
>But {B, C} forbid joining final clubs, according to the oath promising to
>swear no other oaths. So they are final.
>
>If you want to try to create a final club that doesn't swear any oaths,
>that goes against the definition. The mirror case is not valid.
This is how I interpreted first, but John says that if
Joining B precludes joining A, then joining A precludes
joining B. Otherwise, you have to argue against my other
definition, the one for asymmetrical preclusions. No fair
mixing examples like that.
co'o mi'e xorxes
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GET A NEXTCARD VISA, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as 0.0%
Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees. Apply NOW!
http://click.egroups.com/1/937/1/_/17627/_/952123368/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com