RE: [lojban] RECORD: abstractions from names.

[Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>]

On Sat, 22 Apr 2000, And Rosta wrote:

> xod:
> > On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, And Rosta wrote:
> >
> > > pc:
> > > > Being John Malkovitch is, presumably, le zu'u la djan malkovitc.
> > >
> > > I don't have any reference materials handy, but that doesn't look right.
> > >
> > > My effort, from feeble memory:
> > >
> > >   le zu'u ce'u me la djan malkovitc
> > >
> > > The ce'u is grammatical, I think. I'm less sure whether the meaning of the
> > > whole is appropriate, though.
> >
> >
> >
> > ki'a (confusion!)
> >
> >    zu'u [ UI3 ] on the one hand
> >           discursive: on the one hand - on the other hand (cf. karbi,
> >           frica. dukti)
> >
> >
> > ru'a do'o nitcu zo za'i
> > (perhaps you meant "za'i").
> 
> [a curious but not inapt use of "nitcu"]
>

ki'e (thanks!)
 
> I mean the NU for activity -- or rather, that's what I assumed pc was using.



le su'u tcini cu smuni zo za'i 
(za'i = "the state of-",) 

.i za'a ri zmadu zo nu le ka mapti be zoi gy. being .gy
(which seems to fit "being" better than the event abstraction.)




> I don't have even a ma'oste on my PC here, so can't check.


http://www.animal.helsinki.fi/lojban/selmaho.html



-----
In the Linux world, all of the major distributions have turned into 
companies. How much revenue would Red Hat generate if their product 
was flawless? How much support would they sell?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Win $1000 at eGroups!
Click here to find out how:
http://click.egroups.com/1/2861/2/_/17627/_/956391341/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com