[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component

To: Thorild Selen <thorild@update.uu.se>
Subject: Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component
From: PILCH Hartmut <phm@A2E.DE>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 10:33:55 +0000 (/etc/localtime)
Cc: lojban@egroups.com
Delivered-to: shoulson-kli@meson.org
Delivered-to: kli-mark@kli.org
Delivered-to: mailing list lojban@egroups.com
In-reply-to: <200005122338.BAA02914@Zeke.Update.UU.SE>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:lojban-unsubscribe@egroups.com>
Mailing-list: list lojban@egroups.com; contact lojban-owner@egroups.com

> Does anyone have a good suggestion for how to talk about centuries
> and decades in lojban?

what about something corresponding to the x in 

	"the years 17xx"  
	"the years 170x" 

-phm	


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remember four years of good friends, bad clothes, explosive chemistry
experiments.
http://click.egroups.com/1/4051/3/_/17627/_/958214574/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com

References:
- Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component
  - From: Thorild Selen <thorild@UPDATE.UU.SE>

Prev by Date: [lojban] Endianness
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] centripetality: subset vs component
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread