Re: [lojban] coi rodo - mi'e .aulun.

["Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>]

la ivAn cusku di'e

> All things considered, I'd go for {tcuan,ts} and {xuei,ts}.

Sounds good to me.

> {do na finpe} vs {do na du mi} does not quite get across the
> parallelism of the original, which had, I take it, something
> like _ni3 bu4shi4 yu2_ vs _ni3 bu4shi4 wo3_.  There should
> be a way of making the two utterances more similar. ...

{do na me mi} maybe. The lack of parallelism makes it more
clear what is the flaw in the argument, which the formal
parallelism of the Chinese expression perhaps helps to cloud.

co'o mi'e xorxes

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com