Re: [lojban] Re: lujvo

[Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>]

"Bob LeChevalier (lojbab)" writes:
>examining the underlying assumptions, or those who talk about Sherlock 
>Holmes, who is unquestionably a fictional character.  (we've been over lo 
>[unicorn] many times in this forum).

OK, I've missed the lo [unicorn] discussion (and I'd use lo [dragon]
anyways, since single-horned goats which their breeders call unicorns do
in fact exist 'objectively), but assuming that one can say lo [dragon]
outside of a fantasy novel without sounding like a moron, I obviously
was misinterpreting the implications of lo.  I would have read "lo
[dragon] klama" as ipmyling something like "Some dragons, oh, by the
way, dragons really exist, go", which is apparently wrong.  So I take it
all back.  :)

-Robin

-- 
http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rlpowell/ 	BTW, I'm male, honest.
... stripped of our uniqueness as human beings by Darwin, exposed to our
own inadequacies by Freud, ... Power -- "the ability to bring about our
desires" -- is all that we have left.  --- Michael Korda, _Power!_

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vegas, Baby!
Great deals on airfare, hotels and
car rentals from Expedia.com!
http://click.egroups.com/1/5206/3/_/17627/_/960960958/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com