Re: [lojban] Mi za'o klama

[pycyn@aol.com]

In a message dated 00-06-16 14:37:12 EDT, xorxes writes:

<< If what used
 to be the destination is no longer the destination, then the
 relationship is no longer going on, and za'o does not apply. >>


I think the point is that Pineville still is the *destination* but not the 
place he is going to end up -- at least unless he turns around.  Suppose he 
stops off in Charlotte; his destination is still Pineville but he has stopped 
short of it and that is the (nearly mirror to za'o){mi co'u klama la painvil 
la ralix} or (more completely) {mi klama la painvil la ralix co'u la carlyt}  
If a person uses {za'o} in the original  sentence then he is, admittedly, 
continuing the same relation, but that relation does not depend on where he 
ends up.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lonely? Get Firetalk!
Free, unlimited calls anywhere in the world.
Free voice chat on hundreds of topics.
http://click.egroups.com/1/5477/3/_/17627/_/961188261/
------------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com