Re: [lojban] Another morphology question

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

Cyril Slobin wrote:

> Curiouser and curiouser... And what about fu'ivla? Something like
> "brodrxae"?

I am pretty sure that is not valid any more, although it may have been
valid at one time.  Of course "xa'e" and "brodrxa'e" are perfectly all right.

-- 
There is / one art                   || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less                    || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things                   || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness                 \\ -- Piet Hein