[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: missing cmavo [was: Re: [lojban] abstraction focus

To: michael helsem <graywyvern@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: missing cmavo [was: Re: [lojban] abstraction focus
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 15:19:16 -0500
Cc: lojban@egroups.com
Organization: Reuters Health Information
References: <F112evWWGxegIqunLOy000012a9@hotmail.com>
Sender: cowan@mail.reutershealth.com

michael helsem wrote:
> 
> also ZI'A & ZI'U can be inferred from ZI'E (compound relative
> clause connectors).

No.  "zi'e" stands alone.

-- 
There is / one art                   || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less                    || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things                   || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness                 \\ -- Piet Hein

References:
- Re: missing cmavo [was: Re: [lojban] abstraction focus
  - From: "michael helsem" <graywyvern@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: missing cmavo [was: Re: [lojban] abstraction focus
Next by Date: Re: missing cmavo [was: Re: [lojban] abstraction focus
Previous by thread: Re: missing cmavo [was: Re: [lojban] abstraction focus
Next by thread: Re: missing cmavo [was: Re: [lojban] abstraction focus
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread