Re: [lojban] RE:su'u

[Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>]

On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, And Rosta wrote:

> I am satisfied to assert merely "Yes, because I can't understand (I)
> except by taking it #as a synonym for (II)", but in fact as we have
> debated off-list in the past, I also think that (I) has graspably
> different consequences from (II). IIRC, the main arguments were
> that intensional contexts, such as Ortcutt espionage sentences,
> and -- more controversially -- cross-world identification of
> individuals work only under (II). (Those are the philosophical
> arguments. There are further linguistic arguments that pertain
> to English and other natlangs but not to Lojban.)



I am very eager to see as many real consequences of the difference between
I and II as you can post.



-----
We do not like                                       And if a cat
those Rs and Ds,                                     needed a hat?
Who can't resist                                     Free enterprise
more subsidies.                                      is there for that!