dai was: rabbity sand-laugher

[cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri <cmeclax@gmx.co.uk>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

de'i Fri, 08 Jun 2001 la Bob LeChevalier (lojbab) cusku di'e
> If I understand you (always a big "if" since I don't do enough Lojban 
> reading), this is precisely what pycyn was complaining about that I thought 
> was NOT applicable to the discussion.  Lojban attitudinals, as expressions, 
> NEVER "mean" a bridi, which is a claim.  "pe'idai" is NOT a claim that the 
> other person opines something (which is what "do jinvi" means; rather it 
> says that the speaker intuits/empathizes that the other person seems to be 
> expressing the emotion marked with dai.  Having used dai on an evidential, 
> we have to treat that evidential as an emotional expression (the 
> evidentials can be used attitudinally, so this makes sense) that the 
> speaker is picking up.

I used "a'adai" for "Note:", that is, to mark something that the reader should
pay attention to. Is that an appropriate use of "dai"?

cmeclax
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7ITIlBETrxUjAxlERApMrAJ93F2dgJOzyUh1v4pC0xFgx7SO8HwCfQ6h+
m4dOwCwkEPqEEhJAhE3rtEk=
=Dr2u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----