[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] mo

To: Jay Kominek <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>
Subject: Re: [lojban] mo
From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 00:38:04 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.33.0108172202001.29880-100000@ucsub.colorado.edu> from Jay Kominek at "Aug 17, 2001 10:05:57 pm"

Jay Kominek scripsit:

> I'd guess you're correct. Only other possibility seems to be that you're
> asking for n different answers (where n is the number of mo), to the same
> question, or something.

No, I think that is done with mo gi'e mo gi'e mo or the like.
Of course two separated mo's makes good sense:

mi mo le se du'u mo
cusku vau mi klama le zarci vau

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore
	--Douglas Hofstadter

References:
- Re: [lojban] mo
  - From: Jay Kominek <jay.kominek@colorado.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] Chomskyan universals and Lojban
Next by Date: Re: junta [was: Re: [lojban] selma'o considered harmful
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] mo
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] mo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread