[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] Another stab at a Record on ce'u

To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [lojban] Another stab at a Record on ce'u
From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:13:49 -0400
In-reply-to: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEDAEKAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
References: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMEEDAEKAA.a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>
Reply-to: rob@twcny.rr.com
Sender: Rob Speer <rob@telenet.net>
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i

I'm starting to see what you mean by problems with word order in bare ka, by
the proposal that I think was xorxes' and that I think is the one you put on
the Wiki. So now my thoughts have come full-circle to this:

1. A ka with ce'u in it means what it says. (I believe everyone but pc would
   agree to this.)
2. A ka without ce'u in it means something, and good luck figuring it out.
-- 
Rob Speer

References:
- RE: [lojban] Another stab at a Record on ce'u
  - From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@dtn.ntl.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] The Knights who forgot to say "ni!"
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] Another stab at a Record on ce'u
Previous by thread: RE: [lojban] Another stab at a Record on ce'u
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] Another stab at a Record on ce'u
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread