[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] The Knights who forgot to say "ni!"

To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] The Knights who forgot to say "ni!"
From: cmeclax po'u le cmevi'u ke'umri <cmeclax@gmx.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 00:29:38 -0400
In-reply-to: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0108281653010.26385-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
References: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0108281653010.26385-100000@reva.sixgirls.org>
Sender: cmeclax@ixazon.dynip.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

de'i Tuesday 28 August 2001 17:05 la Invent Yourself cusku di'e
li'o
> However we run into trouble with ni, because it already has a 2nd place!
> Therefore it must be
>
>  le nilprami pe mi
>  The amount I love

I put the x2 of ni in last place in the lujvo:

nilselylacri: x1 is how much x2 is relied upon by x3 to do x4, on scale x5

nilsimsa: x1 is the amount of similarity between x2 and x3 in property x4 on 
scale x5 (in the nilsimsa program, x4 is short letter sequence frequencies 
and x5 is [-128,128])

The exception to this is of course the variadics, but I haven't had occasion 
to use a nil- lujvo of a variadic.

co'omi'e cmeclax.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7kbWzBETrxUjAxlERAkslAJsEi8CItOa+BFdmub35MzZeAPYhYQCgqIAg
lb1ZLHFsJakPG35Ce8gUMZc=
=NaQG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- The Knights who forgot to say "ni!"
  - From: Invent Yourself <xod@sixgirls.org>

Prev by Date: clashes
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] klanrvolti
Previous by thread: The Knights who forgot to say "ni!"
Next by thread: Re: The Knights who forgot to say "ni!"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread