[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Just a phrase
- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: [lojban] Just a phrase
- From: Rob Speer <rob@twcny.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 19:14:43 -0400
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0207020154320.26765-100000@party.lan.ice.ru>
- Mail-followup-to: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- References: <20020701215033.GA8341@twcny.rr.com> <Pine.LNX.4.30.0207020154320.26765-100000@party.lan.ice.ru>
- Reply-to: rob@twcny.rr.com
- Sender: Rob Speer <rob@riff>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 01:58:15AM +0400, Cyril Slobin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Rob Speer wrote:
>
> > {ka'enai} is in the top 20 most frequently used compounds, used
> > as frequently as {lemi}. Usage has already decided that {ka'enai} should
> > be valid.
>
> {ka'enai} has no advantages over {na ka'e}. I'm not a strong baseliner,
> but I opine baseline should be broken only when it brings some new
> expressive power to the language.
{ka'enai} is "properly" expressed as {na'e ka'e}. Of course {na ka'e} is
very close in meaning, but if you use it in a complex sentence you get
the confusion that comes with {na}.
And {na'eka'e} is just grating on the ears...
--
mu'o mi'e rab.spir