[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question

To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question
From: EWC <thanatos@dim.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2002 12:38:44 -0600
In-reply-to: <20020703182634.GT2538@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
References: <20020702202324.A65525@allusion.net> <0207031322060D.02128@neofelis> <20020703172941.GR2538@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <0207031424320F.02128@neofelis> <20020703182634.GT2538@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Reply-to: thanatos@dim.com
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org

On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 11:26:34 -0700, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:

>After discussing it on IRC, I am now firmly of the opinion that unbound
>ko'a is best in this case.  Maybe "ko'a poi remei" if you want to
>clarify.

ro/re zo'e ?

-- 
EWC

References:
- pro-sumti question
  - From: Jordan DeLong <lojban-out@lojban.org>
- Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
- Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
- Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question
  - From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
- Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question
  - From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question
Next by thread: Re: [lojban] pro-sumti question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread