Jordan DeLong wrote:
Now that's interesting. "remei" means "is a pair", so "le remei" means "that which I call a pair". I don't see a problem here. The "individuality" of "le" is, I think, in the eye of the observer - by using "le remei", I convey that I am thinking of the pair as an entity , which is surely what is called for here.This is bullshit. "*le* remei" can't refer to a set no matter what x1 of remei is. le == individual, le'i == set, lei == mass.
robin.tr -- "We're clouds over the sea, or flecks of matter in the ocean when the ocean seems lit from within. I know I'm drunk when I start this ocean talk." - Rumi Robin Turner IDMYO Bilkent Üniversitesi Ankara 06533 http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin