Re: [lojban] Report on LogFest 2002

[Invent Yourself <xod@thestonecutters.net>]

On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Edward Cherlin wrote:

> On Tuesday 30 July 2002 10:05 pm, Bob LeChevalier-Logical Language
> >
> > Part of this has always been intended, in that we declared years
> > ago that following the 5 year minimum baseline, any debates and
> > decisions as to possible changes in the language will take place in
> > Lojban-only, and my own opinion is that this part of the transition
> > to all-Lojban, in technical management of the language, is more
> > important than completely losing English in conducting the everyday
> > business of the organization (something we of course cannot do
> > completely, since we will still have to use English in dealing with
> > outsiders like the government).
>
> OK, that means that we need a Lojban translation (better, a second
> edition) of the Refgrammar, and of some of our favorite reference
> works on logic.


What do you mean by this?



-- 
Nisha, 26, clutching an ice cream and her toddler son, read impassively
through a leaflet calling for immediate dialogue with Pakistan to avert
the horror of a nuclear war. "Why should we worry about this?" she said
with a shrug. "India has more nuclear weapons than Pakistan. We will
wipe them off the map and win the war."