Re: [lojban] Arbitrary baseline violations (was: zo xruti xruti)

[John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>]

Jorge Llambias scripsit:

> >If there is substantial agreement that it is broken, then someone write it
> >up using Cowan's "techfix" format, and we can ask Robin (or Jay on the
> >wiki) to set up a place for these change proposals to be
> >accumulated.  We'll figure out how to decide officially what to do sometime
> >before the dictionary is published, probably much sooner for this one since
> >it affects translation of the gismu list.
> 
> That sounds reasonable, is there a sample format available somewhere?

http://www.lojban.org/files/machine-grammars/techfix.300

-- 
Deshil Holles eamus.  Deshil Holles eamus.  Deshil Holles eamus.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit.
Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!  Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!  Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!
  -- Joyce, _Ulysses_, "Oxen of the Sun"       jcowan@reutershealth.com