[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lojban] termsets

To: jjllambias@hotmail.com (Jorge Llambias)
Subject: Re: [lojban] termsets
From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:14:13 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
In-reply-to: <F267eYus87tzrT9jqSk00012fdd@hotmail.com> from "Jorge Llambias" at Sep 06, 2002 03:23:39 PM

Jorge Llambias scripsit:

> In the case of ve'a and ze'a, I don't think the Book
> disagrees with me. In the case of va and za, the Book
> has a different interpretation for the tagged sumti:
> the origin of the displacement, rather than its
> magnitude. This is unnecessary, because the origin
> can already be tagged with PU and FAhA.

True, but historical precedent made it necessary.  I intended to remain
silent on the sumtcita use of intervals, since there are different
precedents pulling different ways.

-- 
John Cowan                                   jcowan@reutershealth.com
        "You need a change: try Canada"  "You need a change: try China"
                --fortune cookies opened by a couple that I know

References:
- Re: [lojban] termsets
  - From: "Jorge Llambias" <jjllambias@hotmail.com>

Prev by Date: "boring"
Next by Date: Re: [lojban] "boring"
Previous by thread: Re: [lojban] termsets
Next by thread: RE: [lojban] termsets
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread