Re: [lojban] Re: word for "www" (was: Archive location.)

[Robin Lee Powell <lojban-out@lojban.org>]

On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 05:25:58PM -0400, pycyn@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 9/11/2002 12:42:43 PM Central Daylight Time, 
> lojban-out@lojban.org writes:
> 
> <<
> > It is not the case that the whole point of lujvo is that someone
> > > should be able to dissect them and figure out what you mean. The whole
> > > point of lujvo is that they are words formed from parts that have
> > > independent meaning within Lojban, but with a meaning that is not
> > > equivalent to the sum of their parts. Their dissectablity is not their
> > > point.
> > 
> > OK.  What is their point?
> >>
> Now who is being deliberately obtuse?

Obtuse, maybe.  Deliberately, no.

-Robin

-- 
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ 	BTW, I'm male, honest.
le datni cu djica le nu zifre .iku'i .oi le so'e datni cu to'e te pilno
je xlali -- RLP 				http://www.lojban.org/