[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: I like chocolate
pycyn@aol.com scripsit:
> Of course, this involves a looks-like correlation (not at all natural, for all
> that) and the case might be harder with non-representational or differently
> representational (e.g., cubism) conventions
I think it's erroneous to talk of "non-representational painting", a painting
being essentially a representation, though not perhaps of anything we can see.
"Non-objective painting" might be more appropriate. If a painting weren't
a representation, it would be what Mark Twain said Whistler's painting was:
a canvas covered with smears of tomato juice (or something to that effect).
"We must be very careful to avoid wifty thinking."
--David Jenner
--
What is the sound of Perl? Is it not the John Cowan
sound of a [Ww]all that people have stopped jcowan@reutershealth.com
banging their head against? --Larry http://www.ccil.org/~cowan