[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lessons deadline
- To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
- Subject: Re: lessons deadline
- From: Nick Nicholas <opoudjis@optushome.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:24:02 +1000
- In-reply-to: <a05111b5ab9af05ac8df6@[128.250.86.21]>
- References: <a05111b5ab9af05ac8df6@[128.250.86.21]>
What I'm saying is, I want to do this. But I don't think I'll get
the time to do it in the next two weeks. And because there is now a
prospect that the Level 0 might need to take priority (so we can use
it as a trial baloon for Print On Delivery), I'm wondering if I
shouldn't extend the deadline on myself for finishing it to the end
of October. Opinions welcome.
What I meant to add was, a book chrestomathy may render it
superfluous to add reading passages to the lessons. Although thinking
better on it, I now disagree.
We're talking one or two paras at the very end of each lesson. In
fact, we're quite likely talking 4 or 5 in the lessons, rather than 1
per lesson...
--
**** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** ****
* Dr Nick Nicholas, Linguistics/French & Italian nickn@unimelb.edu.au *
University of Melbourne, Australia http://www.opoudjis.net
* "Eschewing obfuscatory verbosity of locutional rendering, the *
circumscriptional appelations are excised." --- W. Mann & S. Thompson,
* _Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organisation_, 1987. *
**** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** **** ****