[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [lojban] Re: Sets and classes
- To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: Sets and classes
- From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 12:17:03 +0100
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <02092123232207.02144@neofelis>
Pierre:
> On Saturday 21 September 2002 23:07, Jorge Llambias wrote:
> li'o
> > Perhaps the rule should be changed so that unfilled sumti places
> > should by default be filled with {zi'o} rather than {zo'e}? It
> > would certainly make some things more intuitive.
>
> No, they should be filled with {zo'e} so that whatever is implied by context
> can go there. But in this case, the sumti implied by context is {zi'o}.
I'm sure that the list archives would show that it has been firmly
established that {zi'o} and {no da} are not permissible values for
{zo'e}.
--And.