RE: [lojban] Re: interactions between tenses, other tenses, and NA

["And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>]

John:
> And Rosta scripsit:
> 
> > To me it seems one of the more naturalistic features of Lojban --
> > a quirky, exceptional, counterintuitive, unnecessary complication,
> > of the sort natlangs are full of & Lojban is largely free of.
> 
> What is alien is that a contradictory negation particle should be other
> than at the beginning of the sentence.
> 
> In Loglan, sentence-initial "no" served this function.  IIRC, Lojbab
> consciously moved it from the natural sentence-initial position to just
> before the selbri "because it was more naturalistic".  IMHO a mistake.

As is obvious, I agree that the decision was a terrible mistake, but
the idea that "it was more naturalistic" is fairly defensible,
given that (a) some lects of English have it, and (b) quirkiness,
exception-riddenness, counterintuiveness and unnecessary complication
is highly characteristic of natlangs, as evidenced by the way that
more accomplished naturalistic artlangers deliberately try to add
it to their conlangs.

--And.