[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [lojban] Re: paroi ro mentu
la djorden cusku di'e
> baku zo'u ge mi klama la paris gi mi klama la romas
This works in this case, but as we discussed it's not something you
can generally do unless you move every other tense (and in the paroi
case, move everything with a quantifier) into the prenex also to
preserve order.
Of course, but exactly the same happens with {pa prenu}. You
can't treat it separately from all other things that have
relevant scope.
> ta'eku mi klama la paris e la romas
>
> This is:
>
> ta'eku zo'u ge mi klama la paris gi mi klama la romas
> Typically, I go both to Paris and to Rome.
I agree with the first line (though, as I said above it doesn't work
in the general case without moving other shit into the prenex also)
Of course, everything with scope that comes before it must move
to the prenex before it.
but I think your translation to english is bad. I think the sentence
means the translation you give for the next sentence. To get the
sentence you said, I think you would need either
ta'eku mi klama la paris. jo'u la romas.
or
ta'eku mi klama la paris. joi la romas.
Ok. That's a possibility. You're saying that tags never
have scope over other sumti. Then when we apply this to
{paroiku}:
(1a) paroiku mi klama la paris e la romas
expands to:
(1b) paroiku mi klama la paris ije paroiku mi klama la romas
And:
(2a) paroiku mi klama ro le re tcadu
expands to:
(2b) roda voi tcadu zo'u paroiku mi klama da
For each of the (two) cities, I once went to it.
Also:
(3) paroi le pavdei e le reldei mi klama la paris
will expand to:
(3a) paroi le pavdei mi klama la paris
ije paroi le reldei mi klama la paris
And similarly:
(4) paroi ro le re djedi mi klama la paris
will expand as:
(4a) roda voi djedi zo'u paroi da mi klama la paris
Q.E.D.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com